Stake and plaintiff must settle the case in private
The judge ruled that Boyle must settle the dispute privately with Stake’s parent company, Sweepsteaks, and it is not a matter for the courts.
“The Court can only conclude that there is no procedural unconscionability as Boyle has failed to meet his burden,” the judge commented. “Therefore, the Court finds that Boyle must arbitrate his claims with Sweepsteaks.”
This represents a victory for Stake and all sweepstakes casinos in their legal battles. The Social and Promotional Games Association (SPGA) celebrated the ruling, commenting, “This ruling affirms what we’ve long said: Social sweepstakes sites are not gambling.”
An SPGA spokesperson went on to add, “They are free-to-play games enjoyed responsibly by millions of American adults, and no purchase is ever necessary to play or have a chance to win prizes.”
“Anyone can file a lawsuit making any claims they like,” the statement continued. “This ruling is a reminder that facts — and the law — still matter.”
Stake is also facing lawsuits in Illinois and Alabama over similar accusations that it is flaunting state gambling laws with its business model.
Sweepstakes growing amid legal challenges
A new report showed that sweepstakes casinos are outperforming legal online casinos in the US, growing their player base at triple the rate. Stake is leading the way in the US, despite its Stake.com site being blocked.
Stake.us had over 23 million visits in February this year and on its website claims to be the “World’s Largest Online Casino and Sportsbook.”
Co-founder, Ed Craven, has boasted that, “Stake has hit a point now where I’m confident our betting volume is the highest in the world out of any casino, land-based or online.”
Judge Allows Stake.us To Stay Active In California, For NowLawmakers and state regulators have been increasing the pressure on unlicensed operators, however. Montana became the first state to officially make sweepstakes casinos illegal, and many other states are debating similar moves in legislative chambers.
The decision in California could set a precedent for other lawsuits against sweepstakes operators, but the battle between regulators and lawmakers looks set to continue across the US.